Comparison · QD vs FullEnrich
FullEnrich orchestrates 20+ sources. We hand you the finished file.
FullEnrich takes rows you already have and fills in what is missing, querying source after source until one answers. We build the list itself, checked by a person, before anyone loads it anywhere. This page sets the two side by side, with a source and a date on every figure.
- 92%+
- Deliverability target
- Stated guarantee · 2026
- 750
- Verified leads, Pilot
- 250 companies · 3 contacts each · 2026
- 5–7d
- Turnaround
- From a confirmed brief · 2026
The difference
A find rate, and a checked file.
| Measure | FullEnrich | Qualified Deals |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A waterfall enrichment service. You send it a name and a company; it queries its sources in turn until one returns a contact. Their pricing page says 25+ sources, their homepage 20+.fullenrich.com/pricing · checked 20 Aug 2026 | A research project. You brief a senior analyst once, and a finished file comes back.Pilot scope · 2026 |
| What they hold | No database of their own. Their published FAQ: “We do not have any contact database, meaning we do not store contact information. We only select providers that are CCPA and GDPR compliant.” They also state SOC 2 Type II certification.fullenrich.com/pricing · checked 20 Aug 2026 | No database either. We assemble each file for the brief in front of us and hand it over; nothing is resold from a previous project.Pilot scope · 2026 |
| What the headline number measures | A find rate — “waterfall enrichment with +80% find rate”. That is how often the waterfall returns a contact for a row you send it.fullenrich.com · checked 20 Aug 2026 | A deliverability target — 92%+ — which is how many of the addresses we hand you accept mail. Above an 8% hard-bounce rate we replace every bounced record free.Stated guarantee · 2026 |
| What gets checked | Advanced email and phone verification is listed on every plan, including catch-all verification, which they put at 80% of catch-alls resolved. No human review step is described.fullenrich.com/pricing · checked 20 Aug 2026 | Every contact is cross-checked by a person against LinkedIn and the company website before delivery, and the date of that check is recorded on the row.Delivery SOP stages 1–5 · 2026 |
| How you are metered | Per result found, at published rates: 1 credit a work email, 3 a personal email, 10 a mobile number, 1 a reverse email lookup. Credits are consumed only on a successful find.fullenrich.com/pricing · checked 20 Aug 2026 | Not metered. One fee, one scope: 750 verified leads across 250 companies, whatever it takes us to reach them.Pilot scope · 2026 |
| What you receive | Enriched rows returned to whatever you sent them from — CRM integrations, an API, a no-code connector and an MCP server are all listed.fullenrich.com/pricing · checked 20 Aug 2026 | 750 verified leads as XLSX and a CSV that imports cleanly, 5–7 days from a confirmed brief.Pilot scope · 2026 |
| Bounce policy | Credits are not spent when nothing is found, and their pricing page leads with “Verified, Or It’s Free.” No replacement policy for a delivered address that later bounces is stated.fullenrich.com/pricing · checked 20 Aug 2026 | Seven-day bounce replacement. Report above 8% inside the window and every bounced record is replaced, re-verified, within 5 working days.Stated guarantee · 2026 |
The two headline figures are not comparable, and that is the useful part. A find rate answers “did the waterfall return something for this row”. A deliverability target answers “will the addresses you were handed accept mail”. A row can be found and still be wrong — the person moved, the title changed, the company was acquired — because finding an address and confirming the person still sits behind it are two different operations.
Every FullEnrich figure above is theirs, published on their own pages and quoted as they word it. We have not tested FullEnrich and publish no measurement of it. We name none of their sources either: they publish a count rather than a list, and their suppliers are not ours to assert.
How we verify
Brief, Source, Verify, QA and deliver.
| Stage | What happens | Artifact produced |
|---|---|---|
| 01Brief | A 30-minute Project Brief call with a senior analyst — not an SDR — to scope the ICP, territory, titles, volume and timeline. Ten fields, all required before research begins. If the brief shows we are not a fit, we say so before any work starts. | The signed research brief |
| 02Source | Analysts map the territory across twenty-plus sources — ZoomInfo, Apollo, Clay, LinkedIn Sales Navigator, Cognism, Lusha, Crunchbase, PitchBook and company websites — triangulated rather than exported. Accounts outside the brief are dropped here. | The raw master source sheet |
| 03Verify | Every contact is cross-checked by a person against LinkedIn and the company website: current role confirmed, employer matched, email format validated. The date of that check is recorded on the row. SMTP-only verification is the floor, not the ceiling. | The LinkedIn cross-check log |
| 04QA and deliver | A 10% spot-check by a second person, with zero QA failures permitted — anything that fails goes back to the analyst. Records that cannot be confirmed are removed, not shipped as Pending. Then a CRM-ready XLSX and CSV with a count summary. | The QA spot-check sheet |
What you receive
One workbook, four sheets, and a CSV that imports cleanly.
Delivered as QD_[Client]_[Package]_[YYYYMMDD].xlsx with a matching UTF-8 CSV for direct CRM import. Phone columns are formatted as text, so long numbers do not arrive as scientific notation.
1 · Read Me
Client, package, ICP summary, delivery date, record counts, the verification method, and the guarantee stated verbatim.
2 · Verified Leads
One row per person. Company, contact, exact title, LinkedIn URL, verified email, confirmation date, status.
3 · Companies
One row per company. Domain, employee band, HQ country, sector, and the accounts we excluded.
4 · Method
Sources used, the verification steps applied, the exclusions, and the QA sample size.
| Company | Contact | Title | Confirmed | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N•••••• Systems | D. R••••• | VP Engineering | 2026-07-28 | Verified |
| C•••••• Labs | R. M••••• | Head of Infrastructure | 2026-07-29 | Verified |
| A••••••• Digital | S. T••••• | Director, Service Delivery | 2026-07-29 | Verified |
| V•••••• Cloud | J. P••••• | Chief Technology Officer | 2026-07-30 | Verified |
If you already run a waterfall
Three things buyers say first.
FullEnrich already waterfalls 20+ sources for us.
That is finding, not checking
The waterfall gets to a match faster than any one source would, and it is good at it. But the match has still not been read against a live LinkedIn profile or the company site. That reading is what turns a match into a contact we will put our name behind, and it is the step no waterfall performs.
We only pay for successful matches, so it is efficient.
It is — and worth crediting
Paying nothing for a miss is a fairer model than most, and we would not argue against it. The thing to watch is what “successful” buys: their own card prices a mobile number at 10 credits against 1 for a work email, so a phone-heavy list runs ten times the meter. A Pilot has a fixed scope and no meter to watch.
Running our own waterfall gives us more control.
And the upkeep with it
Control here means choosing the sources, watching the burn, and deciding what counts as a successful find for your ICP — decisions someone on your team owns every week. A Pilot is one decision and one deliverable: you brief us, and a finished file arrives.
Cost
A meter that runs, against a scope that closes.
FullEnrich’s figures are their published card, read on 20 August 2026, at the Pro slider’s default position of 1,000 credits a month. The unit rate falls as the volume rises — the same slider renders $720 a month at 15,000 credits, which is $0.048 a credit against $0.055 here. Theirs is a monthly subscription and ours is a one-time fee, so the two columns are not a like-for-like quote and are not offered as one. Both rows exclude tax.
FullEnrich publishes dollars only, so the other three currencies are converted at the mid-market rates recorded for 16 August 2026. Our own prices are unchanged from the pricing page.
FAQ
What buyers ask when a waterfall is already running.
Is Qualified Deals a FullEnrich alternative, or a complement to it?
A complement, most of the time. FullEnrich takes rows you already have and fills in the missing contact details, across 20-plus sources, in seconds. We start further back: you tell us the profile of company and person you sell to, and we build the list itself, checked, before anyone loads it anywhere. If you already have the accounts and only need the addresses, they are the faster answer. If the list does not exist yet, enrichment has nothing to enrich.
How does paying per successful match compare to a fixed Pilot price?
They are different purchases rather than competing quotes. FullEnrich publishes a free trial with 50 credits, then one paid plan on a volume slider — $55 a month at 1,000 credits, $0.055 each, falling to $0.048 at 15,000. A Pilot is $420 or ₹35,000, once, for 750 verified leads across 250 companies. The arithmetic worth doing is not the per-record one. It is what you are holding when you stop paying: a subscription leaves you with whatever you exported, a project leaves you with the file and the verification dates on it.
Does a “successful match” mean the same thing as a Qualified Deals verified contact?
No, and this is the distinction the whole page turns on. FullEnrich publishes a find rate — how often the waterfall returns a contact for a row you send it — and they put it above 80%. That is a real number measuring a real thing. It is not an accuracy rate, and they do not present it as one. A row can be found and still be wrong: the person moved, the title changed, the company was acquired. Our check is a person opening LinkedIn and the company website and confirming the named individual still holds the job, with the date of that check recorded on the row. Finding an address and confirming who is behind it are two operations, and only the second one is ours.
Can a Qualified Deals list be used alongside an existing FullEnrich workflow?
Yes, and it slots in without either side changing. Delivery is a CRM-ready XLSX plus a UTF-8 CSV with a BOM, with field mapping agreed before delivery, so a Pilot lands in the same CRM your enrichment already writes into. Teams that run both tend to use us for the campaign list and the waterfall for the rows that arrive afterwards — inbound sign-ups, event scans, an imported account list.
Related comparisons
Weighing more than one of these.
- A guarantee much like ours
- The closest comparison here. Both publish a number and attach a remedy to it — theirs returns a credit after the bounce, ours returns a re-verified record, and the check runs at a different point.
- A workflow you build and staff
- Clay orchestrates providers; we hand over the finished list. What each one is, who has to operate it, and what a workflow costs once it is running.
Book a project brief
Keep the waterfall for the rows that arrive later. Tell us who you sell to and the list arrives verified.
A senior researcher reads every brief and replies from a named address.